Alexander the Great: A Reader

What annoys me is that of all the published articles, no single one is has a proper date. There is a long article by J.F.C. Fuller, who died in 1966. Fuller was born in 1878 (!), took up interest in Alexander in 1917 (!) and wrote his major works about Alexander around 1957. But Fullers article in Worthingtons reader is published without any proper dating, confusing readers to expect that it might be especially written for Worthingtons 2003 edition of "A Reader". That cant be true. Mister Fuller would have been 125 years old!

So Worthingtons edition - to me - seems like a hoax.

That doesnt mean that some of the articles arent truly worthwile. Thats why there are still 2 stars in my rating. But in general: I fear that books like this tend to downgrade the overall reputation of a scientist / editor in the long run.